What was Article 370?

The abrogation of Article 370 — a constitutional provision that granted a special status to the former state of Jammu & Kashmir — remains one of the most consequential policy decisions of recent Indian history. On 5 August 2019, the central government moved to revoke much of this special status and reorganised the region into two separate Union Territories: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. This decision has had multi-fold implications for politics, governance, security and socio-economic life.

This article analyses the background of Article 370, the reasons for its revocation, key judgments and policies that followed, the reactions (both domestic and international), and the state of play today.

What was Article 370?

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir a degree of autonomy: it had its own constitution, flag and could make laws in many subjects, subject to limitations (foreign affairs, defence, communications remained under the Centre).

TIME

+1

Over decades, many of its provisions were diluted by Presidential Orders and legislative changes, but it remained symbolically significant in constitutional and regional terms.

Why was it abrogated?

The central government’s arguments for rescinding the special status include:

That the provision had been used (in the view of the government) to foster separatism and delay full integration of the region. For instance, the Home Minister claimed terrorism incidents dropped by over 70 % following abrogation.

The Indian Express

That many constitutional rights, welfare schemes, reservation benefits and legal protections could not be fully extended to J&K because of its special status, so revoking it would bring parity.

The Times of India

+1

A vision of “one nation-one constitution” — that the country needed uniform application of constitutional rights, duties and governance. The Supreme Court of India also characterised Article 370 as part of “asymmetric federalism” and a provision classified as “temporary”.

The Times of India

Key Judicial and Political Milestones

In December 2023 the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the abrogation of Article 370 (and the restructuring of J&K and Ladakh).

mint

+1

The Court reiterated that J&K’s separate constitution was now redundant and that the Indian Constitution applied in full.

The Times of India

+1

Review petitions to revisit the verdict were rejected in May 2024.

Business Standard

Politically, the central government (and its allied parties) hail the move as pivotal for national unity and governance reform.

The Economic Times

+1

The Impact So Far

Governance and Development

The Home Ministry has reported several metrics: the budget for J&K increased from about ₹80,423 crore in 2019-20 to ₹1,18,500 crore in 2023-24; road construction pace doubled; 302 bridges built; road projects worth ₹3,637 crore sanctioned.

The Times of India

Local self-governance manifested with 34,000+ elected members to rural/urban local bodies under the three-tier Panchayati Raj system.

The Times of India

The region’s tourism saw revival: for example 1.9 crore visitors in 2022.

The Times of India

Security and Political Stability

According to official figures, terrorist initiated incidents dropped by ~45 % between 2018 and 2022; infiltration dropped ~90 % between same period; stone-pelting incidents fell dramatically.

The Times of India

The central government asserts these changes demonstrate a dismantling of the “terror ecosystem.”

The Times of India

Reactions and Remaining Challenges

Some regional political parties and local commentators argue that the decision bypassed democratic consultation and that statehood and full political rights have yet to be fully restored. For example, leaders labelled the verdict “disappointing”.

India Today

+1

Internationally, voices such as the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) voiced concern; the Indian government rejected these as “ill-informed and ill-intended.”

www.ndtv.com

Why It Matters

Federalism and Constitutional Norms: The abrogation emphasised the central government’s view that certain autonomous arrangements may not be compatible with a uniform constitutional framework.

National Integration: For many in the ruling coalition, the move symbolised the “mainstreaming” of the region into India, thereby reinforcing territorial integrity.

Economic & Social Inclusion: By making national schemes and rights uniformly applicable, the government argues a long-stalled region can now catch up.

Security Landscape: The region has been a locus of cross-border tensions, insurgency and political unrest — any changes to it ripple into defence, diplomacy and internal security.

Where Things Stand & What to Watch

Assembly elections for J&K: The Supreme Court directed elections to the legislative assembly by September 2024 (originally).

The Times of India

+1

Full statehood: Restoration of full state status to J&K remains a matter of political debate and implementation.

Local sentiments: While some regional voices now recognise developmental gains (for example, former Congress leader Salman Khurshid said he observed ‘prosperity’ in Kashmir)

Navbharat Times

many others believe the process still falls short of full participatory democracy and local empowerment.

Monitoring rights and civil liberties: Human rights groups continue to highlight past and ongoing issues, especially in context of the transition period after abrogation.

External implications: The Kashmir region remains central to India-Pakistan relations, regional security in the Himalayas, and geopolitics (including China’s interests in Ladakh).

Conclusion

The revocation of Article 370 marked a seismic shift in India's policy towards Jammu & Kashmir. Its significance lies not only in the constitutional repositioning of the region but also in the social, economic and security transformations underway. For many supporters, it represents a long-awaited integration and opening up of the region; for critics, it raises questions about local autonomy, governance, rights and process.

As the region moves forward — with development initiatives, elections, and evolving governance — the true measure will be how these changes translate into everyday reality for the people of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh: improved livelihoods, robust local democracy, secure peace, and sustained trust.