Any Remuneration Received By A Partner Of A Partnership Firm Is Not Service: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand

    • CESTAT ruling on exclusion of freight and handling charges from assessable value of excisable goods
    Tags
    Finance Act 1994CESTATM/s. Ernst & YoungIncome tax returns (ITR)Customs Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)Bangalore BenchService TaxPartnership firmRemunerationServiceGautam Bhattacharya Versus Commissioner of Central Tax
    Next Story